Saturday, June 29, 2019
Lawyer Jesse Halfon explains legal liability re scooter laws. Caveat emptor
https://www.citylab.com/perspective/2019/06/electric-scooters-dockless-regulations-liability-helmet-laws/592861/
STUDY-Hunter College Grad Ctr. Helmet Use:Type of Cyclist
Use of Helmets
Altogether, over two-hs of the cyclists were observed wearing helmets. The
use of helmets varies considerably by type of cyclist. Fiy-four percent of male
commercial cyclists, who are mandated by law to wear helmets, were found to be
compliant with this law.
4
Notably, general riders were far more likely to wear a
helmet than Ci" Bike riders (45.2% vs. 30.3%). There is also a gender gap in the
use of helmets among both general riders and Ci" Bike riders. Among the general
riders, females are more disposed to wearing a helmet than their male
counterparts by a margin of 52.1 percent versus 44 percent. Among the Ci" Bike
riders, the gender gap remains but is considerably narrower (33.8% vs. 29.1%).
Table 2. Helmet Use by Type of Cyclist
Helmet Use by Type of Cyclist
Helnet use Male Gen'l Female GR Male Citi Female Ci Male Total
Rider Rider Rider Commercial
Yes 44% 52.1% 29.1% 33.8% 54.4% 43.1%
No 56% 47.9% 70.9% 66.2% 44.6% 56.9%
Total 100% 100% !00% 100% 100% 100%
1831 328 875 284 837 4155
Helmet Use by Type of Cyclist
Helnet use Male Gen'l Female GR Male Citi Female Ci Male Total
Rider Rider Rider Commercial
Yes 44% 52.1% 29.1% 33.8% 54.4% 43.1%
No 56% 47.9% 70.9% 66.2% 44.6% 56.9%
Total 100% 100% !00% 100% 100% 100%
1831 328 875 284 837 4155
Friday, June 28, 2019
20 Most Bike Friendly Cities -Wired Magazine NYC Conspicuously MISSING
The 20 Most Bike-Friendly Cities on the Planet, Ranked
Although most cities cited are European-The Big Apple
is conspicuously MISSING.
Although most cities cited are European-The Big Apple
is conspicuously MISSING.
14th St plan "lacking in rationality" Taxis vs FHV
OPINION: 14th St. plan favors Uber and Co. over taxis
BY CAROLYN PROTZ AND SERGIO CABRERA | As The Villager has reported, city officials have developed a carless plan for 14th St. in order to mitigate the impact of intermittent reductions of service on the L-train line. The plan has generated considerable anger among a number of local and advocacy groups who have now filed suit against the city. (https://www.thevillager.com/2019/06/suit-slams-14th-st-bus-plan-urges-court-action/)Somewhat lost in all of the controversy surrounding the lawsuit is the fact that the city has given for-hire-vehicles like Uber and Lyft (F.H.V.’s) — but not New York City taxis — special dispensation to traverse 14th St. in order to pick up passengers. This special
exemption is the essence of arbitrary and capricious, and should surprise no one that taxi medallion owners agree with the lawsuit’s observation that the plan lacks “some modicum of rationality.”
From a taxi standpoint, the lawsuit’s indictment of the plan was dramatized the other day at a City Council hearing on the role of New York City and the Taxi and Limousine Commission in the decimation of the value of the taxi medallion. Councilmembers took turns excoriating the T.L.C. for its willful blindness and collusion in the decline of the industry. (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/24/nyregion/taxi-medallion-investigation.html)
One of the central complaints made by medallion owners was that T.L.C. aided and abetted the decimation of the taxi medallion by exempting F.H.V.’s from many of the same strict regulations that were mandated for taxis. (https://www.crainsnewyork.com/op-ed/real-killers-taxi-medallions)
Perhaps the most egregious example was the T.L.C. allowing F.H.V.’s access to the Central Business District — otherwise known as the “Taxi Exclusionary Zone” — for the price of a $250-a-year license when medallion owners had paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for that very same right.
Another exemption involved the requirement for wheelchair accessibility. The city mandated that 50 percent of all taxis must be wheelchair accessible by 2020 — a requirement that places extra financial burdens on cabbies. Yet, for more than four years, Uber and Lyft rejected the demands of advocates, and resisted all legal efforts at compliance. (https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/stuck-neutral-de-blasio-leaves-wheelchair-users-curb-article-1.2957859)
In the end, a watered-down compromise was reached that falls far short of the taxi mandate, one that gives Uber and Lyft another unfair competitive advantage. (https://www.gothamgazette.com/opinion/7362-the-city-s-bogus-compromise-with-uber-would-hurt-riders-with-disabilities)
What aggravates us to no end, is that for the past four years, taxis (but not the F.H.V.’s) have contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority — 50 cents for each passenger fare. At the same time, as most transit experts agree, the F.H.V.’s have been draining resources and riders off of the buses and trains. Allowing a 14th St. exemption to the culprits who have made mass transit worse is really a case of adding insult to injury, not only to taxis, but to mass transit riders, as well. (http://fortune.com/2017/10/13/uber-lyft-public-transit-ridership/)
The bottom line is that if 14th St. is to be car-free, then there should be no exemption for any entity, but especially not for one that has played a major role in making congestion in New York City so much worse. (https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2017/02/27/its-settled-uber-is-making-nyc-gridlock-worse/)
However, if any exemption is to be created, it should be given to the taxis — whose numbers have been capped since 1937 — and which have always been seen as a protected public franchise and an iconic symbol of New York City.
Protz and Cabrera are taxi medallion owners
Facebook14TwitterEmail
Thursday, June 27, 2019
It's Not Easy Being Green editorial
- IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREENIt's not easy being green. Or NYPD blue. But the color of congestionis choleric.The bike build out was ballyhooed as “visionary”. A jewel in the crownof billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg's” luxury destination” It has beenan exercise in zealotry. Resulting in world class congestion and a publicsafety crisis.An epidemic of scofflaw cycling has produced numerous injuries,deaths and too many harrowing close calls to count.Surely this was not the intention of Mayor Bloomberg or thevisionaries.Transportation experts and laymen alike knew that importing Europeanbike programs was misguided. The logistics of street width and populationdensity are far different.It's like trying to force a square peg into a round hole. It's not easybeing green.Bike lobbyists Transportation Alternatives acquired undue politicalinfluence. The DOT under Commissioner Sadik Khan avoided anenvironmental impact study. She also refused to join a task force-a cooperative effort-including the NYPD and FDNY-where realitywould have been confronted.Where a responsible bike culture might have been established.NYPD enforcement was undermined by years of being kept ona short mayoral leash. Rogue cyclists acquired a sense of entitlement.Helmets were not mandated. Licensing fought.The outcry to havedelivery cyclists-often employing motorized truck bikes-was deridedas oppressive.All this side stepping of reasonable regulation enabled to “promoteridership.” The proof is in the pudding. New York has been takenfor a ride.The Citibike program enables people to rent a bike. Avoiding repairsand maintenance. The lack of repair work and increasing commercialrent puts small bike shop owners out of business.Bike lifers who helped build the bike culture.The enterprise is now controlled by The Related Companies.The blue bikes have mechanical problems. Renters are less concerned about rough riding,repairs and personal safety.Tourists unaccustomed to city traffic take a ride on the wild side. Plunging into bike bedlam and motorists with congestion patience failure. A trickle of lawsuits indicates it may expand into a costly stream. According to a January 2018 study by Partnership for New York congestion will cost the city 100 billion dollars by 2013.The inability of emergency vehicles to negotiate bike lane squeezed streets can cost lives.There are over 3 million commuters who use public transportation 12 months a year. Around 80,000 cyclists-most of whom are young and healthy commute-weather permitting.What's wrong with this picture? A case of the tail wagging the dog.Bike lanes have shrunk vehicular lanes., One million more residents increases density. 50,000 more ride share vehicles. Voila world class congestion. First the public was slammed by rampant lawless riding. Recently congestion pricing was passed. Under whose control and exact terms still uncertain. What is certain is that the public has been hit by a tax. The result of unwise planning and political complicity. The bicycle advocates have conflated “going green” with an ends justifies the means bike build out. A dominoe effect has unleashed a bevy of problems. Tunnel vision disruptive. Politicians who are happy to accept campaign contributions while soliciting votes from a vociferous bike lobby say that it is an enforcement problem. Putting the onus on the NYPD whose authority has been undermined. What can be done? Ideally a comprehensive city plan. In the near term an independent study needs to be conducted. It would objectively assess the costs and benefits. Current and future of the bike build out. Thus providing reason and balance. The scooter lobby and two wheeled motorized vehicles are already bringing another layer of lawlessness. Ultimately it is in part an enforcment issue and needs to be treated as such. It deserves firm mayoral support. The NYPD needs to be given the tools and manpower to accomplish it. Use a compstat approach. Establish a unit that coordinates with local precincts. Cops on bikes. Cops on scooters. Licensing would provide revenue and a means of identification.Enforce the laws regulating delivery agents and the businesses that employ them. Enforcement at night is imperative. Finally enforcement must be smart, sufficient and sustained..
Poem-Close Call Bike Accident
This morning on First Ave and 12th St a bike rider went down.
On
his own. I walked over as he pulled his bike to an island and leaned
against a tree.
A road worker came over..The rider said he hit a pot
hole. "Wasn't paying
attention."
The road worker pointed out that he hadn't been riding in the bike
lane.
That area is smooth. Prepared to accommodate cycling.
Biker nodded his head. Holding his right thumb. Gathering himself.
Smart to be wearing a helmet.
Fortunate that a car hadn't been close enough to hit the downed cyclist.
Something to think about.
Monday, June 24, 2019
OP ED NYPOST 6-21-19 NY has to take back turf from 2 wheeled terros
New York has to take back its turf from the two-wheeled terrors
By Post Editorial Board
New York City’s entitled bicyclists regularly endanger pedestrians. So why does the city keep giving them more turf?
A new Hunter College study looked at Manhattan cyclists, and found that 24% blow through red lights, 30% use electronic devices while biking and 6.4% wheel the wrong way down the street.
That’s not just contempt for the law, it’s contempt for the people
who have to scramble out of the way of these Lycra-clad menaces.
And while a bike may not be as deadly as a car, the cyclist is more likely to come up on you out of nowhere.
Plus, watching your phone while cycling is just nuts. “It’s difficult enough to navigate a city street on a bike in and of itself, but wearing an electronic device . . . could endanger other street users,” notes Hunter sociologist Peter Tuckel, who authored the study.
Sure, too many pedestrians also get distracted on their phones — but that doesn’t make them a menace to others.
But the cyclists somehow control ever more of the city, which now has over 1,200 miles of bike lanes, with more on the way. How does the loss of motor vehicle lanes not increase congestion?
Sooner or later, regular New Yorkers need to take back their streets.
A new Hunter College study looked at Manhattan cyclists, and found that 24% blow through red lights, 30% use electronic devices while biking and 6.4% wheel the wrong way down the street.
see also
And while a bike may not be as deadly as a car, the cyclist is more likely to come up on you out of nowhere.
Plus, watching your phone while cycling is just nuts. “It’s difficult enough to navigate a city street on a bike in and of itself, but wearing an electronic device . . . could endanger other street users,” notes Hunter sociologist Peter Tuckel, who authored the study.
Sure, too many pedestrians also get distracted on their phones — but that doesn’t make them a menace to others.
But the cyclists somehow control ever more of the city, which now has over 1,200 miles of bike lanes, with more on the way. How does the loss of motor vehicle lanes not increase congestion?
Sooner or later, regular New Yorkers need to take back their streets.
Trending Now on NYPost.com
-
This story has been shared 48,038 times. 48,038
-
This story has been shared 36,428 times. 36,428
-
This story has been shared 29,444 times. 29,444
Subject: Fw: Fwd: Video: 'Nobody Cares' About E-Scooters Despite E-Bike Crackdown
Both
need to be illegal-or the enforcement needs to be consistent and
effective-for public safety reasons-and revenue raising. The current
situation is NOT tenable.
Both
Bloomberg & DeBlasio administrations have been negligent. The rogue
riders have been enabled. The NYPD has been undermined and now seems to
have
largely
thrown up its hands. The public has been harmed. Every day we are
reminded of this having to treat our every step as a walk on the wild
side. NOT acceptable.
NOT
worthy of New York City. It will require a mayor getting behind a
cooperative effort. Compstat approach. Special squad that coordinates
with local precincts. Cops on bikes. Cops on scooters., Sustained until
the cyclists ride responsibly and the public is calmed. Then consistent
sufficient enforcement. Transportation Alternatives arm twisted and
spun its way
to
undue influence. Now its going to be harder to put the beans back in
the lunchbox.Let's get this addressed prior to Mayor DeBlasio's exit.
Leave a legitimate legacy of effective
governing.
Thanks-
Jack Brown
Coalition Against Rogue Riding
FEMALE MESSENGER FATALLY STRUCK ON 6th Ave
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Jack Brown <jckmbrown@yahoo.com> wrote:
Chirlane- Please convey to Mr. Seth Stein that his PR words ring hollow. Messenger was not in the bike lane so the system can be tight as a Riker's cell and if a rider doesn't use it-SO WHAT? Time is coming when Mayor de Blasio is going to have to face the reality of this public safety crisis. Perhaps by that time his quixotic pursuit of the presidential nomination will have ebbed and flown.Regards-Jack BrownCoalition Against Rogue Riding.CHELSEA, Manhattan (WABC) -- A female bike messenger was fatally struck by a delivery truck in Manhattan Monday morning.
It happened just after 9 a.m. Monday on Sixth Avenue between West 23rd and 24th streets in the Flatiron District.
Authorities say the 20-year-old woman was riding in the middle of the street and not in a bike lane when she was struck by a white delivery truck.
The incident was initially reported as a hit and run, but police say the driver circled back and was not issued any summonses.
He was apparently unaware he had struck a person but was flagged down a few blocks from the crash and immediately returned to the scene.
The victim was bleeding from the head and was rushed to Bellevue Hospital, where she succumbed to her injuries.
Her identity has not yet been released, but friends say she was from Virginia and staying in Brooklyn.
The area was closed for the investigation, leading to major traffic delays.
The victim's helmet and belongings were still lying in the street hours after the crash.
The Department of Transportation says this is the 11th bicyclist to die this year, compared to 10 cyclists in all of 2018.
"We grieve at any loss of life on our streets, and our thoughts are with the victim's family and friends," said Seth Stein, a spokesman for Mayor Bill de Blasio. "While cycling continues to explode in popularity, we will continue our work to make our bike lane network safer for everyone."On Jun 24, 2019, at 2:43 PM, Jack Brown <jckmbrown@yahoo.com> wrote:Was she wearing a helmet? She was in the road-not bike lane. Something very sadly wrong with this picture.The lack of a responsible bike culture is causing injury and death.How the situation in the streets and on the sidewalkshas come to this displays a negligence-a depraved indifference-to human life, the quality of life and human suffering in thecity. A public safety crisis that has been allowed to wind out of control by conflating going green with promoting an irresponsibleindifference to reason and balance. These deaths, severe injuries and untold number of harrowing close calls are theresult of a perhaps delusional assault on the rights of the public to satisfy the greed and ego of a few The reality is NO ONEbenefits with the streets and sidewalks out of control. NO ONE.Jack BrownCoalition Against Rogue RidingTo: Jack BrownSent: Monday, June 24, 2019, 11:45:42 AM EDTSubject: FEMALE MESSENGER FATALLY STRUCK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
It reminds us again that for all the propaganda released about this plan, it was, and is, a disastrous plan for anybody but the lobbying groups that have deep pockets and influence our representatives.
I wonder who (possibly), in the current city administration, was promised a job, from Uber or Lyft, after they leave their current government one or maybe campaign contributions to seek higher/other office?