Monday, January 27, 2020

Opinon NYDN-Gov. Legalizes motorized 2 wheelers.

No one intendes to discriminate against immigrants. The USA is a nation of same. We simply wants them to ride responsibly. Not to increase the level of jeopardy on the streets and sidewalks.One would believe that  City officials should aspire to protect the rights of citizen/pedestrians-cyclists-motorists. Where is the responsible bike culture? Why has the NYPD not been allowed to create sustained effective enforcement? Would not licensing all motorized 2 wheelers make sense? Easier for NYPD to enforce the law. Collect fees to contribute to the upkeep of the streets. All the rights-with impunity-and none of the responsibility do not  law abiding citizens make.

Wheel see: The path to a safe introduction of e-bikes and scooters on New York streets is clear

Make way.
Make way. (Getty Images)
A second attempt to legalize zippy e-bikes and e-scooters on the state’s streets is here, the result of negotiations between Gov. Cuomo and the Legislature, and it fixes some but not all of the mistakes made in the first go-round.
Wisely, the new framework would require stand-up, motorized scooters — including those that might be part of any scooter-sharing network, except in Manhattan where that’s barred — to top out at 15 mph, while limiting their use to 16-year-olds and up and requiring minors wear helmets. We want helmets for all but can live with this compromise if speeds are properly capped.
It would prohibit e-scooters and e-bikes on sidewalks (yes, kiddos can still ride there) and break e-bikes into three categories based on whether they’re throttle-powered or pedal-assist, and their speed, with the fastest allowed to go up to 25 mph and requiring helmets.
And, as before, local governments can have tighter restrictions, though we think outright bans are silly in an age when bicycles have made a big comeback.
Still, we don’t get how cops can consistently enforce laws based on fine distinctions about whether a given e-bike or scooter is going 15 or 16 mph, or 20 or 21 mph. And how does one at a glance tell apart three classes of e-bikes, none of which needs a license to ride, and three classes of mopeds, all of which require licenses and registration?
Let no one be under the illusion that enforcement, if there is any, will be anything but arbitrary.



Monday, January 20, 2020

Revel Scooters generating lawsuits NYPost

Scooter-sharing service Revel is racking up

Scooter-sharing service Revel is racking up injury lawsuits months after launch

This makes for some uneasy riders.
Moped-rental service Revel has only accelerated chaos on the streets of Brooklyn and Queens, endangering riders and other travelers alike through shoddy training and faulty parts, a series of lawsuits claim.
With just $5, a valid driver’s license and Revel’s smartphone app, users can ride off on one of the 1,000 electric-powered scooters the company has rolled out in the boroughs since May 2019 — no training required.
That level of ease has turned outer-borough traffic into a high-stakes road test, according to lawyer Daniel Flanzig, who represents two people bringing personal-injury suits against Revel in Brooklyn Supreme Court.
“New York City is not the proper place to be learning for the first time how to ride a scooter,” said Flanzig. “It’s not all that far off from a motorcycle.”
Among Flanzig’s clients is Paul Dicesare, a bicyclist who claims he suffered a broken ankle in a June collision with a Revel rider near York and Gold streets in Downtown Brooklyn, filings show.
Revel “was vicariously liable for the reckless, careless and negligent acts of its driver,” argues the suit, which seeks unspecified damages.
But the rides — which can hit a top speed of 30 miles per hour — aren’t just alleged to be dangerous to other travelers.
In a suit filed through another attorney, Revel rider Afadikwei Reyes claims that a moped locked up on him mid-ride, causing a crash that left him with two fractures in his leg.
As Reyes was riding along Bergen Street near Buffalo Avenue in Crown Heights early one August morning, “the vehicle began malfunctioning, with the steering mechanism locking and the breaking [sic] system failing to slow the moped,” according to that suit.
Enlarge ImageA Revel scooter
Richard Harbus
Dicesare and Reyes are among seven people who have filed personal-injury suits against the company — a rate of nearly one per month since the service expanded to 1,000 two-wheelers in May 2019.
Under state law, a motorcycle license is not required for mopeds that top out at 30 mph — a low barrier to entry that regular motorcycle riders say is a recipe for disaster.
“They’re making it exponentially more dangerous,” said Nick Trocano, manager of the Union Garage motorcycle shop in Brooklyn.
Trocano said that he’s regularly spotted Revel riders flouting laws by cutting against traffic through bike lanes, riding without helmets — which are required by law — and zipping along areas that are supposed to be off-limits to the scooters, including the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway and the bridges over the East River.
“In this densely-populated area, if you crash one of their scooters, you are not just hurting you and your passenger,” said Trocano. “The mom and the little girl in the crosswalk [are] hit by a sliding scooter.”
Enlarge ImageMichael Flaherty
Michael FlahertyRICHARD HARBUS
The NYPD said that it does not track the number of motor-vehicle accidents specifically involving Revel mopeds.
In a statement, Revel said that the company does not comment on pending lawsuits, but insisted that novice users can learn to their hearts’ content before hitting the mean streets of the city.
“Revel offers free, in-person lessons seven days a week so new riders who want to learn more about our vehicles and practice driving them in a comfortable, supervised setting have that opportunity,” said a spokesman for the Brooklyn-based start-up.
But even some of its own customers said that they take their lives into their own hands by mounting up.
“Someone is going to die and then they are going to have to figure it all out,” said Michael Flaherty, as he parked his Revel scooter in front of a Williamsburg deli. “It’ll be a slow process. But this is the future of transportation in New York City, ride-sharing.
“Just try to find parking and you’ll see why.”
Additional reporting by Craig McCarthy
Filed under

injury lawsuits months after launch




Thursday, January 9, 2020

Scooter injury study UCSF

More scooters-more injuries reported.

OOF: Electric scooter injuries have nearly tripled over four years as they've grown in popularity, per new research reported by the Associated Press.
Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, studied government data on nonfatal injuries treated in emergency rooms. "Nearly 40,000 broken bones, head injuries, cuts and bruises resulting from scooter accidents were treated in U.S. emergency rooms from 2014 through 2018," the AP writes. "The scooter injury rate among the general U.S. population climbed from 6 per 100,000 to 19 per 100,000. Most occurred in riders aged 18 to 34, and most injured riders weren't hospitalized."

Sunday, January 5, 2020

NYDN Voicer Paul Camilleri Dec 22,2019



Cammerman’s death and safe riding.
Cammerman’s death and safe riding. (Obtained by New York Daily News)

Bike lanes are a superficial fix

Long Island City: I am an avid cyclist who rides all over the city from Red Hook to the George Washington Bridge. I was deeply saddened to read of the tragic death of Dr. Daniel Cammerman (“Doctor on bike fatally struck by bus in Central Park,” Dec. 18). My condolences and prayers to his family and colleagues.
I am also deeply troubled by the statement from Transportation Alternatives that “New York City has still failed to build a protected and connected bike network that could have prevented this tragedy.” Transportation Alternatives does not help the situation with their typical knee-jerk reaction to another tragic cycling death in the city. The bike lane system is deeply flawed and Transportation Alternatives has not helped in solving the problem.
I would like to hear them say that no one should be cycling on the park transverses. They should not be cycling in bad weather. They should ride the inner roadway and get crosstown on the car-free crosstown inner roadway whether it is the lower loop, 72nd St. or 103rd St. And please do not tell me that I am criticizing the victim. We do not have intelligent and real leadership in this city on the cycling dilemma. Cyclists have to take some responsibility. Paul Camilleri

Saturday, January 4, 2020

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020

                         HAPPY NEW YEAR

                     May 2020 bring a responsible bike culture to New York City.
                     On reason and balance. On rationality.

                     Cheers-
                                         CARR

New York Daily News Voicer Jan 4,2020

Unsafe at any speed     NYDN Jan 4, 2020

Manhattan: Transportation Alternatives operates on the premise that the more cyclists, the safer the streets. They also disparage mandatory use of helmets because it would depress ridership. They also ran from joining a task force that would have addressed the irresponsible bike culture creating a public safety menace in 2010. If a responsible bike culture had been implemented with consistent effective enforcement, many of the deaths might have been avoided. Sidewalks and streets would be far safer than they are. The NYPD has been undermined. Emergency vehicles have been compromised. More riders means more deaths. Without a responsible bike culture, there is no safety. Jack Brown

NUFF SAID.